Chronology . more articles on Brian’s music Brian’s output consists of a large body of orchestral music including overtures, suites, tone-poems, concertos, and 32 symphonies ; five operas; a few large-scale choral and orchestral works; a great many part-songs, both accompanied and a capella; a similar number of solo songs; a small quantity of solo piano music; and a few works in other genres - though several pieces, major ones included, are missing.
Only a few of his most important works have been published, notably by Cranz & Co in the 1930s, in the 1970s by Musica Viva, and currently by United Music Publishers; some even now have never been performed, and many have yet to be heard in public.
Like that of many composers, Brian’s oeuvre can be divided very approximately into a number of creative periods, in his case three. The first lasted from just before the turn of the century to the first years of World War One. Much of Brian’s music from this time is lost, but that which has survived is, generally speaking, characterised by two parallel, contrasting, and often cross-fertilising modes of expression. The first a grotesque, sometimes satirical, vein of humour, as in the English Suite no1 (1903-04) and the Comedy Overture Doctor Merryheart (1911-12); the other a mood of grand seriousness, in works like the orchestral tone poem In Memoriam (1910) and the choral By the Waters of Babylon (1905) and The Vision of Cleopatra (1907).
Between these early works and the post-war compositions of his
maturity stands the opera The Tigers (1916-19, orchestrated
1928-29). Drawing upon much from his earlier burlesque vein, its
action satirises war, patriotism, soldiering, and many other
targets in contemporary English society, in a manner unknown in
‘serious’ music of its time. But a darker dreamworld repeatedly
breaks through the nonsensical surface, and the powerful, elegiac,
sometimes nightmarish music of the opera’s substantial ballet
sequences foreshadows much that was to come in later years.
A lthough humour never entirely left Brian’s music, its manifestation was far less overt from now on. After writing some of his most searchingly expressive songs and part-songs (genres he virtually renounced forthwith), he returned with a new depth and intensity to his vein of grandeur and seriousness.
The work in which he first gave full reign to this became his most famous and notorious - Symphony No 1, The Gothic (1919-27), one of the longest symphonies ever composed, and the work commonly regarded as being written for larger forces than any other known composition. It eventually gave him his greatest public triumph at its first professional performance in 1966, but was most responsible for the damaging and undeserved reputation he acquired as an eccentric composer of huge and unperformable works.
The Gothic is a creation of great seriousness of purpose, in which the inspiration of Gothic architecture, expressed through the Latin text of the Te Deum, combines with many elements from the whole history of Western music from medieval plainsong to the twentieth century to form a vast and immensely varied musical fresco.
The Gothic was a crucial work of Brian’s career. Four more
symphonies and a violin concerto - major works by any standards -
followed in the 1930s, and his ‘second period‘ drew to a close with
the composition between 1937 and 1944 of Prometheus Unbound - a
setting for many soloists, chorus and orchestra of the uncut text
of the first two acts of Shelley’s verse-drama. Its full score,
however, is the most serious casualty amongst Brian’s lost
manuscripts . He seems to have regarded Prometheus as his
masterpiece and the climax of his life’s work, but he experienced a
renewed onset of creativity in 1948 after four years’
A n early fruit of this ‘third period‘, the one-movement Symphony No 8, represented by far his most radical approach to symphonic form so far. His style, grown to maturity through many years of private exploration, was now vastly different from that of any other surviving members of his generation.
In the 24 symphonies which followed No 8 and which, with his four late operas (Turandot (1949-51), The Cenci (1951-52), Faust (1955-56), and Agamemnon (1957)), were by far the most important products of his ‘third period‘, he continued his uniquely wide-ranging exploration of the possibilities of the form, in harmony, linear structure, and orchestration.
In common, however, with most genuinely creative artists, this approach seems to have been the natural form of expression for his creative personality, and not a self-conscious imposition. Though he often worked with vestiges of traditional structures, his symphonic language is most often rooted in a highly allusive kind of metamorphosis through developing variation which amounts almost to a musical ‘stream of consciousness’.
The products of this language are amazingly diverse in their procedures and atmosphere, and they display a trend to ever-greater concentration of though as well as an almost unparalleled capacity for self-renewal at the most fundamental creative levels. The music of Brian’s 80s and 90s, therefore, far from being a nostalgic swan-song or an old man’s trifling, in fact forms in some ways the most forward-looking, original and satisfying body of music in his entire output.
The Brian revival - Robert Simpson_ Brian’s productive
discontinuity - John Pickard
HB’s use of abrupt and often incomprehensible changes is tackled
Havergal Brian and the bare fifth - Rodney Stephen Newton
one specific compositional fingerprint inspected
Brian and Holbrooke - Kevin Mandry
Some stylistic comparisons
Brian and the alternative English musical renaissance - Keith Warsop
Brianus ellipsus - Martyn Becker
On difficulties and unevenness in Brian’s style
A sense of discrimination - PJ Taylor
Is enthusiasm for Brian’s music blind to his weaknesses?
…takes your breath away - Larry Alexander
develops PJ Taylor’s ideas and considers the effect of neglect
Melodic originality - David Perrins …or otherwise
A homage from Germany - Dr Josef Schreier
Excellent wide ranging philosophical article
Brian and the psychologists - Malcolm MacDonald
Freudian and Jungian insights
Havergal Brian and the percussion section - Rodney Stephen Newton
How many masterpieces make a master? - John Aldridge
Considers which of Brian’s works are most likely to gain audience approval
An inter-wars’ reference - Peter Coussee
Brian crops up in Holbrooke’s book _Contemporary British composers
The case of the two Havergals - Lewis Foreman
A Harrow performance in the 1940s
Recording Brian with the Philharmonia - Rodney Stephen Newton
Review of The symphonies of Havergal Brian, volume 2 - David J Brown
Review of The symphonies of Havergal Brian, volume 3 - Martin Anderson
A personal odyssey - Martyn Becker
A personal view - Donald Macauley
Two introductions for those new to HB’s music
Brian and the _urban pastorale_ - PJ Taylor Brian’s style, as exemplified particularly in symphonies 11 and 15
Deciphering Brian - Jeremy Marchant
Some of the issues aurrounding making a performing edition of the symphonies from Brian’s manuscripts
Joined up Brian? - Nicholas Hillyard
Continuity or otherwise in Brian’s music
_Brian’s word setting - Mike Smith
Brian Mahler Shostakovich and Schoenberg: some idle thoughts - Christopher Kettle _ … these articles appear in HB: Aspects of Havergal Brian - see bibliography